Published on: | by

On January 2, 2025, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit delivered a significant ruling and blocked the Biden administration’s efforts to reinstate net-neutrality regulations. The court determined that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) lacked the legal authority to reclassify broadband services under Title II of the Communications Act, a move essential for enforcing net neutrality rules.

Net Neutrality’s Background

Net neutrality is the principle that Internet Service Providers (ISPs) must treat all data on the internet equally, without favoring or blocking particular products or websites. In 2015, during the Obama administration, the FCC classified broadband internet as a Title II telecommunications service, establishing regulations to enforce net neutrality. These rules were repealed in 2017 under the Trump administration, reclassifying broadband as a Title I information service, which subjected it to less stringent regulation.

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

This article was drafted to discuss the recent privacy violations committed by tech giants. The intersection of technology and privacy is an increasingly hot topic, and a specific incident involving Apple’s Siri highlights the challenges tech companies face in balancing functionality with user confidentiality. A post on Reddit’s privacy community brought attention to the issue of Siri inadvertently recording private conversations.

The Incident

Users reported cases where Apple’s Siri voice assistant activated without a clear prompt, subsequently recording fragments of personal conversations or background noise. While Siri is designed to activate upon hearing its wake words (“Hey Siri”), issues like accidental activation can arise, particularly in environments with ambient noise or words that phonetically resemble the wake phrase. These recordings, when captured, may be transmitted to Apple servers for analysis, which the company states is meant to improve Siri’s performance. However, this process also raises questions about consent and data handling.

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

In California, cable service providers are subject to stringent privacy regulations, especially under the California Consumer Privacy Act (“California CCPA”) and other state-specific laws.

The California Consumer Privacy Act is a landmark privacy law in California that grants residents extensive rights over their personal data and imposes significant obligations on businesses that collect, process, or sell such data. The CCPA, which was enacted in 2018 and effective from January 1, 2020, aims to enhance consumer data privacy and transparency.

1. Scope and Applicability:

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

Revenge porn—also known as non-consensual pornography—refers to the sharing of explicit images or videos of individuals without their consent, often with the intent to cause harm, shame, or distress. State and federal laws in the United States address the criminalization of revenge porn. While state laws vary widely, there is also a federal statute that addresses non-consensual pornography.

Federal Law: 18 U.S.C. § 2261A (The SHIELD Act)

   – In 2019, Congress passed the Stopping Harmful Image Exploitation and Limiting Distribution (SHIELD) Act, which amends federal stalking law to include a provision that criminalizes certain instances of revenge porn.

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

Hackers use a variety of methods to compromise computers, email accounts, and bank accounts, typically exploiting vulnerabilities in systems, weak security practices, or human error. Below are some of the most common techniques hackers use to gain unauthorized access:

1. Phishing

– Method: Hackers send fraudulent emails, text messages, or websites that appear to be from legitimate sources (such as banks, email providers, or well-known companies). These messages trick users into providing sensitive information, such as usernames, passwords, or credit card details.

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

The Right to Be Forgotten (RTBF) under Article 17 of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is a legal right that allows individuals to request the deletion of their personal data by data controllers (organizations that collect and manage personal data). It is also known as the right to erasure. Article 17 aims to empower individuals by giving them control over their personal information, particularly in the context of the digital world where data can be easily accessible and long-lasting.

Key Elements of Article 17 (Right to Erasure):

1. Right to Request Erasure: Individuals can request the deletion of their personal data from a data controller if one of the following conditions applies:

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

California has enacted several laws to protect consumer privacy with one of the most significant being the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) which was expanded by the California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA). These laws grant consumers various rights regarding their personal data, including, but not necessarily limited to, the right to request the deletion of their personal information. Here’s how these rights apply to deleting personal information from third-party websites:

Key Consumer Rights Under CCPA/CPRA

1. Right to Request Deletion (Under CCPA/CPRA)

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

In California, electronic signatures for real estate transactions are legal and governed by both federal and state laws. These laws set out the conditions under which electronic signatures are valid and enforceable, particularly in transactions involving real estate.

Key Laws Governing Electronic Signatures in California:

1. Federal Law – Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (E-SIGN Act):

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

As artificial intelligence (AI) technology becomes increasingly integral to various industries, companies face a growing number of legal obligations at the state, federal, and international levels. These obligations address a range of issues, from data privacy and bias to intellectual property and transparency. This article explores the key legal frameworks that govern the use of AI technology and the compliance challenges that companies must navigate.

State Laws

At the state level, the regulation of AI is still in its early stages, but some states have begun to implement laws and guidelines addressing specific aspects of AI, particularly in the areas of data privacy and bias:

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

For startups, intellectual property (IP) and trade secrets are often among the most valuable assets. Protecting these assets is crucial for maintaining a competitive edge and ensuring long-term success. However, startups face unique challenges in safeguarding their IP and trade secrets due to limited resources and the fast-paced nature of their growth. This article outlines the best practices that startup companies should follow to effectively protect their intellectual property and trade secrets.

1. Identify and Prioritize Your Intellectual Property

The first step in protecting your IP is to identify what constitutes intellectual property within your startup. Common forms of IP include:

Continue Reading ›