Published on: | by

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is everywhere and is powering chatbots, approving loans, diagnosing illnesses, and even making hiring recommendations. These systems promise efficiency and accuracy, but what happens when AI gets it wrong? From wrongful arrests due to faulty facial recognition, to biased hiring decisions, to misdiagnoses in healthcare, AI errors can have serious legal and financial consequences. The pressing question is who’s liable? In the U.S. and globally, the law is still catching up. Liability for AI errors can depend on factors such as: (1) the role of human oversight; (2) whether the harm was foreseeable; (3) the contractual relationships between parties; and (4) applicable statutes, case law, and regulatory guidance. This article explores product liability, professional liability, data protection laws, and contractual risk allocation to help businesses and professionals understand who’s responsible when AI makes a mistake.

Why AI Mistakes Are Different from Human Errors

AI is not a “person” under the law. It cannot be sued, fined, or jailed. So, the responsibility flows to humans and organizations but pinpointing which party is responsible can be complicated for obvious reasons.

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming industries from finance to hiring and healthcare to law enforcement. Algorithms now help decide who gets loans, jobs, parole, and medical treatment. But while AI promises efficiency and objectivity, it can also replicate or even amplify existing biases hidden in the data it’s trained on to utilize.

Bias in AI isn’t just a technical flaw since it’s a legal risk. Across the United States and globally, discrimination laws that were written long before machine learning now apply to AI-driven decision-making. Businesses deploying AI must ensure compliance with statutes like:

  • Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (employment discrimination)
Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming industries anywhere from personalized marketing to predictive healthcare and automated decision-making. However, as always, with innovation come legal challenges and questions such as how to handle personal data ethically and legally in compliance with privacy regulations.

If your AI system processes, stores, or trains on personal data, you are subject to data protection laws such as the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), its amendment California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA), and the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). This article breaks down what businesses need to know about AI and data privacy compliance.

  1. Why AI Raises Unique Privacy Concerns
Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is no longer just a tech buzzword since it’s embedded in business operations, government processes, healthcare, finance, and even our daily communications. However, as AI adoption accelerates, so do the legal, regulatory, and compliance challenges for companies, developers, and professionals. AI laws are evolving faster than ever this year. Governments around the world are introducing new rules to address transparency, bias, privacy, and accountability in AI systems. For business owners, executives, and legal teams, staying ahead of these changes is no longer optional — it’s essential. This article outlines the most important AI legal trends for 2025, why they matter, and how your organization can prepare.

The EU AI Act Begins to Take Effect

The EU AI Act, approved in 2024, is the world’s first comprehensive AI regulation. It classifies AI systems into risk categories — minimal, limited, high, and unacceptable — with different compliance obligations for each.

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

With the rapid deployment of AI-powered tools across websites — from customer service chatbots to AI-generated content — the question of whether website operators must disclose when users are interacting with an AI is becoming increasingly important. The answer depends on a combination of applicable laws, industry standards, ethical considerations, and user expectations.

  1. Legal Requirements: California and Beyond

In the United States, California is currently the only state with an explicit law requiring disclosure of AI bots in online communications under certain conditions.

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

This article includes a legal and regulatory perspective on AI behavior and technology, covering U.S. and international frameworks, legal risks, compliance requirements, and the evolving landscape of AI law.

What Is “AI Behavior” in Legal Terms?

In legal contexts, “AI behavior” refers to the outputs or actions of an AI system (e.g., decisions, recommendations, predictions, content generation) and the implications of those actions for:

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

This article constitutes an analysis of California’s Protecting Our Kids from Social Media Addiction Act (SB 976), covering its provisions, intent, and legal challenges.

What SB 976 Covers

Definition of “Addictive Feed”: SB 976 defines an “addictive feed” as any sequence of user-generated media (text, images, audio, or video) that is recommended or prioritized to a user based on past behavior, device data, or preferences—unless it falls within specified exceptions like private messages, manual selections, or predictable sequences.

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

This article is an overview of recent legislation in the United States and California focused on social media regulation and protections for children such as state statutes, federal proposals, court cases, and policy debates:

  1. California’s Landmark SB 976: Protecting Our Kids from Social Media Addiction Act
  • Signed into law by Governor Newsom on September 20, 2024, California’s SB 976 sought to curb addictive design features targeted at minors by requiring:
Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming everything from product recommendations to customer service, search engine optimization, fraud detection, and beyond. However, with great power comes a rising wave of regulatory scrutiny. As lawmakers in the United States and abroad grapple with the risks of AI — from bias to privacy violations and misinformation — businesses using or deploying AI must understand the legal landscape. Whether you’re a tech startup building AI tools, an e-commerce platform using AI for personalization, or a search engine deploying machine learning for ranking and indexing, the regulatory ground is shifting fast for obvious reasons and compliance is no longer optional.

1. U.S. Federal AI Policy: A Patchwork in Progress

While the United States has not yet passed a comprehensive federal AI law, several regulatory efforts are underway:

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

As artificial intelligence (AI) rapidly transforms industries, from healthcare and finance to law enforcement and education, questions of risk, responsibility, and trust loom large. To address these concerns, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) released the AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF) in January 2023 — a voluntary but powerful tool designed to help organizations develop and deploy trustworthy AI systems. While the AI RMF is not a regulatory mandate, its adoption signals a growing consensus around best practices in AI governance. It provides a flexible and principle-based structure that can be used by companies, government agencies, and developers to identify and mitigate the unique risks associated with AI technologies.

What Is the NIST AI RMF?

The AI RMF is a risk-based, socio-technical framework that guides organizations in managing the many facets of AI risk — not just technical errors or security issues, but also fairness, transparency, privacy, and societal impact. It is a voluntary guidance framework developed by the NIST to help organizations identify, assess, manage, and minimize risks associated with artificial intelligence (AI) systems. The AI RMF helps organizations (1) understand and manage AI-related risks across the lifecycle; (2) build transparency, accountability, fairness, and security into AI systems; and (3) align with global AI governance trends (e.g., EU AI Act, OECD AI Principles). It is sector-agnostic and technology-neutral, meaning it can be applied to any organization building or using AI, whether in healthcare, finance, education, defense, or consumer technologies.

Continue Reading ›