Articles Posted in Technology

Artificial intelligence technologies have been used to enhance deepfake campaigns. Deepfake is defined as synthetic media where a real person’s image is replaced with someone else’s likeness. It can be used to create an artificial video of another person and make it look real. It has been used to create celebrity porn videos, revenge porn, or fake news. It uses deep learning artificial intelligence software to create a fake picture or video. So, in essence, it can threaten valid and truthful information by publishing false or inaccurate information.

The technology that permits the creation of deepfake is “deep neural networks” which is one kind of artificial intelligence algorithm that finds large data set patterns. The neural-network structure that is generally used is the “autoencoder” which comprises of an encoder and decoder. The encoder compresses the image to a smaller size and the decoder decompresses the image back to the original size. A similar technology is the VFX which has been used by movie studios for visual effects. However, at the present time, a similar and less expensive technology is available.

There can be problems with deepfake technologies. For example, it’s been used to create fake images or videos of well-known individuals. This, in and of itself, can create legal issues such as defamation, false light, and civil harassment. Defamation is a false factual statement that is not privileged and tends to harm someone’s reputation. Defamation can occur against individuals and corporations and can have a lasting negative effect. False light is similar to defamation but it usually concerns invasion of privacy. So, for example, it can happen when a person is falsely portrayed as something he or she is not due to inaccurate impressions. The Restatement Second of Torts, Section 652, defines it as follows:

Predictive policing has been used to calculate and forecast future crimes. Yes, although it sounds quite futuristic, but it has been used by various private and public organizations. The City of Santa Cruz, California was one of the first state governments that tried to implement this technology in an effort to stop crime. Predictive policing works by using machine-learning algorithms to calculate the possibility of future crimes. It uses mathematics and data analytics to evaluate information and make systematic predictions. It can also use artificial intelligence technology to reach the results. However, after some time, its public officials stopped their efforts to prevent racial inequality. Predictive policing raises several legal issues that will be addressed in this article.

First, there could be a problem with negligent police activity. We know that, once access is granted to a database of private or confidential information, it is highly probable that someone will abuse it. In other words, an agent may use that information in the wrong way. The technology has not proven to be effective in the sense that crime can be predicted. So, the police officers may engage in activities that would constitute harassment instead of protecting the public. C.C.P. § 527.6 defines harassment as “unlawful violence, a credible threat of violence, or a knowing and willful course of conduct directed at a specific person that seriously alarms, annoys, or harasses the person, and that serves no legitimate purpose. The course of conduct must be that which would cause a reasonable person to suffer substantial emotional distress, and must actually cause substantial emotional distress to the petitioner.” So far, predictive policing’s technology has not been able to specify who, when, where, what, how, or why future crimes can take place. It has not been able to tell the specific location of the future crime. So, for these reasons, it could be abused that could lead to negligent policing activities.

Second, there could be a problem when the private or confidential information is used to violate someone’s privacy. Invasion of privacy is a cause of action where the plaintiff sues the defendant for violating his or her privacy rights. The elements for public disclosure of private facts are as follows: (1) defendant publicized a matter regarding the private life of the plaintiff; (2) the publicized matter would be highly offensive to a reasonable person; and (3) it is not of legitimate concern to the public. In addition, invasion of privacy may occur if there is an intrusion upon someone’s seclusion. The prima facie elements for this cause of action are: (1) defendant intruded into plaintiff’s private affairs, seclusion, or solitude; and (2) the intrusion was objectionable to a reasonable person.

Smart devices are being sold to consumers and businesses on a regular basis. They include smart phones, smart cars, smart televisions, smart thermostats, smart doorbells, smart bulbs, smart locks, smart watches, smart speakers, smart refrigerators, and other electronic devices. These smart devices can be recording you or collecting personal data without your knowledge or consent.

Privacy in the internet and technology age has become a major concern. This is primarily due to the existence and availability of smart devices which are even referred to as “smart spies” because they can record and transfer personal information to the hackers who use technical flaws to install spyware. This is why it’s important to review the security settings of the smart device on a regular basis. For example, smart televisions are connected to the internet, and if they are hacked into, they can easily be used for nefarious purposes. Smart speakers and digital assistants are listening to voices and that is why they can be a threat source for their users. They are constantly collecting information with or without the user’s knowledge or consent. There may be a way to delete the recently-recorded information by telling the smart device to delete the last conversation but consumers should read the user’s manual to learn about the options.

Smart doorbells, which are part of a home’s security surveillance system, have cameras and are connected to the internet. Therefore, they can be hacked into and used to record activities. For example, Ring has been questioned for sharing video recordings with police departments and third-party service providers such as Facebook and Google without the user’s knowledge or consent. It is important to view the “authorized client devices” feature to understand which device is accessing the account.

Internet fraud and scams have exponentially increased in recent years. There are several reasons for this development which include the expansion of technology and usage of electronic devices in our daily lives.

The fraudsters find different ways to retrieve sensitive or confidential information in order to commit their crimes. For example, they may extract the information by dumpster diving next to corporations and financial institutions. There have been cases where sensitive information of a corporation’s employees was extracted without authorization. They may also engage in “shoulder surfing” which is another way to surreptitiously extract confidential information from the unsuspecting victim. These activities usually take place close to a bank’s ATM in order to steal the victim’s debit card PIN. They can also use what is referred to as a “skimming device” as a way to obtain sensitive information from debit or credit cards. These devices can be placed on ATMs to procure the confidential information without suspicion. The fraudsters can also obtain sensitive or confidential information by breaking and entering into the victim’s property. This way, they can look into the victim’s house or vehicle for valuable items or confidential documents.

There is a long list of internet fraud methods such as auction scams, rental scams, dating scams, lottery scams, and charity scams. The criminals are finding new ways to trick their victims into relinquishing valuable information – e.g., address, telephone, date-of-birth, social security number, debit or credit card number. Social engineering is another method to obtain information which is usually done by gaining the victim’s trust. It has become one of the main methods for extracting valuable information from unsuspecting victims. The internet allows culprits to anonymously communicate with their victims which is the major issue in lawsuits simply because it takes time and effort to launch an investigation. Our law firm is able to unmask the anonymous culprit’s identity by using the proper tools and techniques. We have access to a network of experts and investigators who can help our clients. We have also established relationships with local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies.

Sextortion is a type of online blackmail. It’s one kind of sexual exploitation that takes place on the internet when an anonymous individual threatens to distribute the victim’s explicit videos or pictures if he or she does not comply with the demands which can include transferring funds through digital currencies. The culprit may use a webcam to extract private information and make threats to harm the victim if the victim fails or refuses to comply with the demands.

The culprit usually follows his victims on websites and chatrooms to gain their trust. The culprit may send a message to the victim that has malware in an effort to hack into the victim’s electronic devices. The victim can make the mistake of clicking on the link which releases the virus on to the computer. The infected computer is now compromised and can be used for nefarious purposes.

The courts have been dealing with sextortion since it is a new problem in the technology age. The law prohibits the non-consensual dissemination of intimate pictures or videos but the litigants or their lawyers have been using laws related to harassment, extortion, bribery, or child pornography. For example, 18 U.S.C. § 2251 prohibits sexual exploitation of children. The following federal statutes could be relevant to these activities: 18 U.S.C. § 2252, 18 U.S.C. § 2422, and 18 U.S.C. § 875.

There are state and federal privacy laws that are applicable to consumers and commercial organizations. There has been much activity with the collection and distribution of private or confidential information in recent years. Personal information can be collected through several methods such as voluntary disclosures, cookies, website bugs, tracking software, malware (e.g., worms, trojans, spyware), and phishing. For example, tracking software can be used to collect information but there must be proper disclosure. Nonetheless, criminals do not follow the rules or guidelines and it is a known fact they have access to the tools and techniques to extract customer information without obtaining authorization.

Personal information is certainly valuable to its owner. It is also valuable to a bad actor who is seeking to misuse the personal information without authorization. The bad actors who obtain personal information in a secretive manner are planning to gain a profit. They may engage in identity theft or online impersonation by using the wrongfully obtained personal information. Identity theft has caused a significant amount of monetary damages to the victims. There are state and federal laws that prohibit identity theft in every jurisdiction. The National Conference of State Legislatures provides a comprehensive list of these laws. In California, the following state laws prohibit identity theft and provide remedies:

1. California Penal Code § 368: It prohibits identity theft against elders and disabled persons;