Published on: | by

The landscape of internet technology and cybersecurity has been significantly shaped by a series of high-profile class action lawsuits. These lawsuits typically arise from data breaches, where large amounts of personal information are compromised due to insufficient cybersecurity measures by companies. Below, we explore some notable cases and their implications for consumers and corporations.

AT&T Data Breach (2024)

One of the most significant cybersecurity class action lawsuits in 2024 involves AT&T. In March 2024, AT&T announced a data breach that exposed the personal information of approximately 73 million current and former customers. The compromised data included full names, addresses, dates of birth, phone numbers, Social Security numbers, and account details.

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

In the State of California, the rules for calling special meetings of members or shareholders of a nonprofit corporation are generally governed by the California Corporations Code. Here are the key points:

Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporations

– Who Can Call a Special Meeting: Special meetings of members can be called by the board, the chair of the board, the president, or by 5% or more of the members.

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

In California, the ability of suspended members of a corporation to hold a special meeting to oust a president depends on several factors, including the corporation’s bylaws, type of corporation (e.g., nonprofit, for-profit), and reasons for the suspension.

  1. Corporate Bylaws: The bylaws of the corporation typically outline the procedures for calling and holding special meetings, as well as the rights and limitations of members, including suspended members. If the bylaws specifically state that suspended members cannot participate in meetings or vote, then those members would not be able to hold a special meeting or vote to oust the president.
  2. Type of Corporation:
Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

Unlawful or illegal cell phone tracking can have serious legal consequences and ramifications. The exact nature of these consequences can vary based on the jurisdiction, the specifics of the tracking, and the laws that were violated. Here are some key points to consider:

1. Violations of Federal Laws

In the United States, several federal laws address the unauthorized tracking of cell phones:

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

Cell phone tracking has become a powerful tool for law enforcement and private entities alike. However, its use raises significant privacy concerns and legal challenges. Central to these discussions is the Tracking Device Statute under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA). This article explores key legal cases involving cell phone tracking and the implications of the Tracking Device Statute.

Understanding the Tracking Device Statute

Enacted as part of the ECPA in 1986, the Tracking Device Statute (18 U.S.C. § 3117) regulates the use of electronic or mechanical devices to monitor individuals’ movements. The statute mandates that law enforcement obtain a warrant based on probable cause before using tracking devices. This requirement ensures judicial oversight and aims to protect individuals’ Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches and seizures.

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

In the United States, cell phone tracking of consumers by private entities such as businesses or advertisers without consent is generally illegal and considered a violation of privacy laws. However, there are some exceptions, such as when the tracking is done with explicit consent or when it’s conducted by law enforcement agencies with proper legal authority, such as a warrant.

Consumer tracking is a complex area of law that involves various federal and state regulations, including the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) and the Communications Act of 1934. Additionally, individual states may have their own laws regarding privacy and data protection. It’s important for businesses to comply with these laws and regulations to avoid legal repercussions and to respect consumer privacy rights.

In an age where digital technologies permeate every aspect of our lives, concerns over privacy and the protection of personal data have become paramount. The Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) stands as a cornerstone in the legal framework governing electronic communications and the privacy rights of individuals in the United States. Within the ECPA lies a significant provision known as the Tracking Device Statute, which addresses the use of tracking devices to monitor individuals’ movements.

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

We discussed the pertinent issues and relevant laws in the previous blogs. In both state and federal jurisdictions, laws related to drone ownership and use aim to balance innovation and safety with privacy and security concerns. Here’s an overview of the key state and federal laws governing drone ownership and use in the United States:

Federal Laws

1. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Regulations: The FAA is the primary federal agency responsible for regulating the national airspace and overseeing the safe operation of drones. The FAA has issued regulations that apply to both recreational and commercial drone operations. These regulations cover aspects such as drone registration, airspace restrictions, operating requirements, and pilot certification.

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

In California, laws regarding the ownership and operation of drones intersect with statutes related to stalking and harassment, particularly when drones are used in a manner that constitutes stalking or harassment. Let’s delve into the relevant legal aspects:

1. Ownership and Operation of Drones

In California, there are no specific laws prohibiting individuals from owning drones. However, drone operators must adhere to regulations set forth by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regarding drone operation. These regulations cover aspects such as registration, airspace restrictions, and safety guidelines. Violating FAA regulations can result in fines and penalties.

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

In the age of advancing technology, the rise of drones has brought both innovation and challenges, particularly concerning privacy rights. In California, where privacy laws are robust, the use of drones around residential homes has become a focal point of legal and ethical discussion. Understanding the intricacies of California laws regarding drones and invasion of privacy is essential for drone operators and residents.

In California, several laws and regulations govern the use of drones concerning invasion of privacy, trespass, and harassment. Understanding these laws is crucial for both drone operators and individuals concerned about their privacy and safety.

1. Invasion of Privacy Laws

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

Blockchain technology has emerged as a transformative force, promising decentralized, transparent, and secure transactions across various industries. However, its rapid adoption has raised complex legal questions, necessitating the harmonization of blockchain applications with existing state, federal, and international laws. Understanding the intersection of blockchain and legal frameworks is crucial for businesses, policymakers, and individuals alike.

State Laws

At the state level, regulations surrounding blockchain and cryptocurrencies vary significantly. Some states, like Wyoming and New York, have taken proactive measures to create favorable environments for blockchain innovation, introducing legislation that addresses digital assets, smart contracts, and blockchain-based businesses. These laws aim to provide legal clarity, facilitate investment, and promote economic growth within the blockchain sector. However, other states have adopted a more cautious approach, with regulatory frameworks that impose restrictions or require licensing for blockchain-related activities. Issues such as consumer protection, taxation, and securities regulation remain focal points for state legislators seeking to balance innovation with accountability.

Continue Reading ›